VYŘEŠENO Pomoc při dešifrování manželských poznámek

[MattH]

Hello,

I am in need of some assistance with deciphering the notes found in this marriage record (see attachment). Given the dates that it mentions, I'm assuming it has to do with his conversion from the Catholic Church to the Hussite Church, but I could be wrong. This marriage record is for Antonin Hajek and Maria Kubikova, who were married in Horní Kostelec in 1892. He was originally from Velké Petrovice. The record in full can be viewed here (login required):

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903 ... G-R9Q&i=50

I appreciate any help with this. Thanks in advance!
-----
Ahoj,

Potřebuji pomoc s dešifrováním poznámek nalezených v tomto manželském záznamu (viz příloha). Vzhledem k datům, která uvádí, předpokládám, že to souvisí s jeho přeměnou z katolické církve na husitskou, ale mohu se mýlit. Tento záznam o sňatku je pro Antonína Hájka a Marii Kubíkovou, kteří se vzali v Horním Kostelci v roce 1892. Pocházel z Velkých Petrovic. Záznam v plném znění si můžete prohlédnout zde (nutné přihlášení):

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903 ... G-R9Q&i=50

Oceňuji jakoukoli pomoc s tímto. Díky předem!

[Made]

It goes to divorce. Two dates indicate two stages of divorce.
Rozvod - the couple is not entitled to live together anymore
Rozluka - divorce is completed, and the marriage doesn't exist anymore

[Mistr Jan]

I would say that rozluka (separation) is the 1st degree/stage and rozvod (divorce) the 2nd, final.
Rozluka here happened in 1919 and rozvod in 1924.
J

[Zora]

1. krok rozvod (od stolu a lože)
2. krok rozluka


Kolega ale bude chtít přepsat adresy, kde manželé bydleli v době konání soudů, na to nevidím. Z

[zeter]

@Mistr Jan - I think the date of 'rozvod' is 28.11.1923 and 'rozluka' 1924 (the years are not very precisely written). The year 1919 is part of the citation of the law ("§§ 15,16 zákona ze dne 22.5.1919 č 320 sb. z. an.")

http://spcp.prf.cuni.cz/lex/320-19.htm

@MattH

the locations
Antonín Hájek, miner from Gladbeck (Herbertstrasse 37)
Marie Kubíková, at the moment in Soběchleby Nr. 10)

EDIT: Please note that after divorce there was no possibility for Antonín and/or Marie to have another church wedding, only a civil one. (But I am not sure how this would apply after conversion to another church.)

EDIT II: order of the events corrected

[Mistr Jan]

1. krok rozvod (od stolu a lože)
2. krok rozluka

Aha, pravda, spletl jsem to, pardon.
(My bad, Zora is right.)

[MattH]

How interesting! So, even if he was living in Germany at the time, Czech law required them to get divorced in their marriage country, or was that because Marie was living in the Czech Repubilc?

[zeter]

Well, they both were Czechoslovak citizens, I suppose, so it seems logical to me that Czechoslovak court would decide. But I am no lawyer.

[MattH]

Yes, that makes sense. A big thank you to you all for your help!